![]() Tak pantas lagikah ia… tetap disebut penyair walaupun tak lagi mampu Saat sendiri juga tak cukup berikan ruang untuk kehadiran satu puisi bersama syair-syair lama yang t’lah lapukĪpa yang harus dilakukan seorang penyair ? Ketika realita tak cukup untuk menginspirasi Saat tak ada sesuatu yang dapat mengilhami Dilarang keras menyalin Puisi & Prosa Kenzt ini di lain tempat tanpa menyebutkan URL website serta nama penulisnya.Īpa yang dapat diberikan seorang penyair ? Join the higher education network for more comment, analysis and job opportunities, direct to your inbox.Puisi & Prosa Kenzt berjudul Seorang Penyair ini ditulis oleh Kenzt. Whatever is decided, it should be done in conjunction with students. This system wouldn’t be perfect, and numbers cannot completely convey the depth of student experience, but it would be a start. Students could then give a single set of numerical scores measuring quality and response to feedback that feed directly into Tef assessments, providing a regular student appraisal of departmental excellence. The Department for Education and universities should develop a feedback system, in collaboration with current students, that future students could regularly contribute to, identifying weaknesses in teaching and offering strategies for improvement. So how do we give students a platform that works? The United Kingdom Engagement Survey is a start, but it doesn’t capture students’ everyday experience. But if the Tef is about ensuring the best quality “product”, then the customer reviewing the product needs to be taken more seriously. Whether we like it or not, the Tef is here, and the government should be applauded for addressing the problem of quality teaching in universities. I haven’t seen a video of British teaching staff reading their reviews yet, but I imagine it’ll be fairly similar to those from the US: frustration, surprise and dismay from staff as students lash out. But these sites aren’t designed to improve teaching, they’re designed to showcase excellent schooling and expose bad practice. It’s no surprise that .uk (the UK version of ) is gaining popularity and criticising the political stance of the NUS, questioning if they “even care” about students. Meanwhile, students are struggling to get their voices heard through the current channels. But apart from the Higher Education Council Funding for England tinkering with the NSS questions, the Tef doesn’t give students a place to get their views into the metrics. This is the expert knowledge that the Tef should put at the forefront of any metric it uses. What about studying at Oxford, an institution consistently ranked highly for student satisfaction? For Cornel Hrisca-Munn, this metric deceived him completely.īeyond the abstract discussion of retention rates, graduate employment and “learning gain” are human stories that can richly describe what happens when university teaching isn’t up to scratch. Or ex-UCL student Laura Warner, who detailed the shortcomings of the 2015 NSS. If you want to learn about the problems of student satisfaction in the era of £9,000 fees, ask Laura Gainer, a former graphics student from Brighton – she can tell you exactly what was wrong with her course. If you give students a platform to tell their stories, they will use it. I know this as a postgraduate teaching assistant. Others fill in module feedback forms with enthusiasm and constructive criticism. Students write passionate reviews of staff for awards entries. UCL found the same thing when its open day was disrupted by angry students who “whited up” when it rejected a masters program on whiteness led by Dr NathanielĪnd ended his contract. Exeter University found that out in 2013 when they tried to sack an English lecturer who was loved by students and had won teaching awards. They recently have won some concessions in the Higher Education Bill, but the Tef is going ahead anyway.ĭespite a survey revealing that students are not very enthusiastic about the Tef, they do care deeply about quality teaching. The NUS are threatening a boycott and spoiling of the National Student Survey (NSS) (a key Tef metric) as a protest. But these groups, rightly or wrongly, have condemned the higher education bill and the Tef outright because they see it as a back door to higher fees. Of course, some would argue that student voice is channelled through the National Union of Students (NUS) and students’ unions, who did respond to the Tef consultation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |